Immigrants from Oceania vs U.S. Virgin Islander Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,888,409 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.923. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in U.S. Virgin Islanders. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 78.3 U.S. Virgin Islanders.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $82,736, a difference of 25.3%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $85,294, a difference of 24.8%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $71,853, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $36,424, a difference of 10.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $47,448, a difference of 13.1%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $41,448, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 45.3%), family poverty (8.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 41.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 13.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 13.9%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 37.1%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 29.4%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.29, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 64.3%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 58.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 41.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.7%), and bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.12%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.24%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.1%).