Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Barbados Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,221,172 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Barbados within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Immigrants from Barbados. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 36.5 Immigrants from Barbados.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 43.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $53,766, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $89,394, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $53,163, a difference of 0.97%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $41,685, a difference of 3.4%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $45,816, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 46.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 41.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 41.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.2%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 39.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 35.1%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 30.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 69.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.9%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 36.8%, a difference of 20.4%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.51%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.95%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 202.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 111.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 86.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 28.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 60.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 86.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.5%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.47%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Barbados communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 34.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.97%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 0.62%).