Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swiss
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Swiss

Average
Good
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swiss Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,889,076 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.459% in Swiss. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 459.4 Swiss.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Swiss Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 16.9%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $37,904, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $61,621, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $55,731, a difference of 0.030%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $103,071, a difference of 0.62%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $104,396, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaSwiss
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Good
$44,076
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Good
$104,396
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Average
$85,681
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Average
$46,315
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Good
$55,731
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Tragic
$37,904
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Poor
$51,493
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Good
$95,511
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Good
$103,071
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Good
$61,621
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Tragic
30.0%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 17.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaSwiss
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Good
8.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Average
13.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Average
20.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Good
13.4%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
17.3%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Exceptional
9.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Exceptional
9.7%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 15.0%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaSwiss
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Poor
7.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.33%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaSwiss
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Fair
79.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Exceptional
43.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Average
82.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.1%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.60%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaSwiss
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Excellent
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
49.9%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.15
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
49.7%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Excellent
30.5%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaSwiss
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
7.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Exceptional
61.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 46.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 59.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaSwiss
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.0%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Exceptional
90.6%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Exceptional
87.0%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Average
65.5%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Average
59.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Average
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Fair
37.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Average
14.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Excellent
2.0%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swiss communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.67%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Swiss Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaSwiss
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Poor
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Good
22.9%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.4%