Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Armenia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,909,019 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Armenia within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.312% in Immigrants from Armenia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 4,311.7 Immigrants from Armenia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 23.7%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $53,974, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $94,863, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $40,340, a difference of 0.11%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $52,986, a difference of 1.3%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $44,552, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 49.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 45.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.9%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.8%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 17.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.7%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 44.3%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 17.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 49.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 39.4%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.78%), college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Armenia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 67.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.76%, a difference of 53.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.36%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.8%).