Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Ecuador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,579,754 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.796. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Immigrants from Ecuador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 48.4 Immigrants from Ecuador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $54,030, a difference of 19.2%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $92,837, a difference of 14.7%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $53,722, a difference of 0.080%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $38,644, a difference of 4.3%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $44,462, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 38.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 38.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 25.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.9%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.14%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.32, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 144.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 80.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 40.5%, a difference of 42.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 62.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 37.5%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 35.6%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Ecuador communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and male disability (11.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.2%).