Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Vietnam Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,925,222 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Vietnam within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.130. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Immigrants from Vietnam. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 34.1 Immigrants from Vietnam.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $43,229, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $55,562, a difference of 3.5%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $91,987, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,453 compared to $106,186, a difference of 0.25%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $40,153, a difference of 0.36%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $47,282, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.74%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.4%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households (64.9% compared to 68.2%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.34%), currently married (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.38, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 26.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 48.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.57%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Vietnam communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 3.6%).