Immigrants from Oceania vs Hispanic or Latino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,327,950 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Hispanics or Latinos within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.548. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.528% in Hispanics or Latinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 528.2 Hispanics or Latinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $35,688, a difference of 26.7%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $85,647, a difference of 24.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $52,832, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $50,279, a difference of 6.8%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $34,421, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 49.1%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 37.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.8%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.7%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.9% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.41, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 7.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.17%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 45.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.2%), and no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Hispanic or Latino communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.1%).