Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Iran Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,754,753 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.150% in Immigrants from Iran. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 150.4 Immigrants from Iran.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $57,759, a difference of 27.7%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $69,284, a difference of 24.4%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $130,894, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $55,880, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 13.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $75,081, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.6%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.5%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 0.68%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 60.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 58.5%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.21%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Iran communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.0%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.4%).