Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Caribbean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 186,602,820 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Caribbean within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.076% in Immigrants from Caribbean. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 75.9 Immigrants from Caribbean.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $48,535, a difference of 16.9%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $83,319, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $36,414, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $50,757, a difference of 1.4%), and per capita income ($37,857 compared to $37,254, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 52.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 48.9%), and receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 1.8%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and single female poverty (22.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 30.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 17.1%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.010%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.33, a difference of 0.35%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 140.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 73.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 14.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 53.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.2%), college, under 1 year (61.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 4th grade (96.3% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 3rd grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Caribbean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.70%), female disability (12.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.7%).