Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Laos
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Laos

Malaysians

Fair
Fair
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,948,020 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.773. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.287% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 1,286.9 Malaysians.
Immigrants from Laos Integration in Malaysian Communities

Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $94,517, a difference of 4.0%), and per capita income ($37,857 compared to $39,194, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $37,298, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($42,884 compared to $43,844, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $58,244, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from LaosMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,857
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,239
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,327
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,884
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,190
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,841
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,041
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,553
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,909
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,722
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.8%
Excellent
25.0%

Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 8.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.81%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from LaosMalaysian
Poverty
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.6%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.8%
Tragic
12.7%

Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 4.8%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from LaosMalaysian
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Average
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Fair
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.9%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Average
7.6%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Fair
5.5%

Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.19%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from LaosMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.4%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.6%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
82.0%

Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.9%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.8% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 0.030%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 0.36%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from LaosMalaysian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.1%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.0%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.0%
Tragic
33.9%

Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.50%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from LaosMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.4%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.33%), 11th grade (90.5% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.35%), and 9th grade (93.2% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from LaosMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.9%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.5%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.7%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.7%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.6%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.40%).
Immigrants from Laos vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from LaosMalaysian
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.5%