Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Eritrea Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 82,789,923 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eritrea within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Eritrea. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 13.2 Immigrants from Eritrea.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $44,509, a difference of 17.6%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $41,485, a difference of 12.6%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $102,823, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,574, a difference of 3.1%), householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $60,096, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $97,373, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (18.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.22%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.66%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.1%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.0%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 31.9%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 53.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 49.0%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Eritrea communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.0%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.2%).