Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,535,216 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.400. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.479% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 479.1 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 47.3%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $41,932, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $50,747, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $50,279, a difference of 2.2%), median household income ($78,327 compared to $76,517, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $88,311, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 49.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 42.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.0%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 50.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 39.9%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 60.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 42.7%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 20.3%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.11%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households (65.3% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 358.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 181.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 146.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 46.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 106.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 146.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.9%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.2% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.16%), 6th grade (95.7% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and 8th grade (94.1% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.92%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).