Immigrants from Laos vs Australian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,842,172 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Australians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Australians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 3.2 Australians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Australian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $52,074, a difference of 37.6%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $118,440, a difference of 28.4%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $62,857, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $53,739, a difference of 7.4%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $43,308, a difference of 17.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $66,891, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Australian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 43.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 31.9%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.59%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Australian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.3%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Australian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Australian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.6%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 3.9%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Australian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 94.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 81.4%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 74.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Australian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.49%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.7%).