Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Singapore Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,577,200 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Singapore within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Immigrants from Singapore. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 15.6 Immigrants from Singapore.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $58,353, a difference of 54.1%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $134,818, a difference of 46.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $124,429, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $56,835, a difference of 13.6%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $72,963, a difference of 28.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 65.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 51.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 54.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 53.1%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.5%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.7%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 58.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 87.2%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 167.5%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 138.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 106.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Singapore communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 45.6%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.0%).