Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from England Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,454,317 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.127. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from England. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 9.5 Immigrants from England.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $48,844, a difference of 29.0%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $112,038, a difference of 21.5%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $59,527, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,817, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $41,277, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $65,715, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 37.9%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.020%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.4%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.5%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.15, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.42%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 83.4%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 63.7%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from England communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.9%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%).