Immigrants from Laos vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,757,553 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 3.7 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $44,206, a difference of 16.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $96,497, a difference of 12.8%), and median family income ($92,239 compared to $103,624, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $52,979, a difference of 5.9%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $40,019, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.1%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (45.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 47.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 46.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.5%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.94%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.2%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.3%).