Immigrants from Laos vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,056,837 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.048% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 47.5 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $45,607, a difference of 7.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $79,956, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $85,187, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $56,768, a difference of 0.080%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $50,132, a difference of 0.18%), and per capita income ($37,857 compared to $36,690, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.2%), receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.43%), female poverty (15.0% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and poverty (13.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.5%), births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.36, a difference of 0.66%), family households (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 16.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.66%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.2% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 8th grade (94.1% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and 7th grade (94.5% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 11.0%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.89%).