Immigrants from Laos vs Navajo Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Laos
Navajo
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Laos
Navajo
2,709
SOCIAL INDEX
24.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
242nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Laos Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,773,737 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.393% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 1,392.7 Navajo.
Immigrants from Laos vs Navajo Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($78,327 compared to $59,159, a difference of 32.4%), per capita income ($37,857 compared to $29,031, a difference of 30.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $69,759, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $33,046, a difference of 11.5%), and median earnings ($42,884 compared to $36,999, a difference of 15.9%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Navajo |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,857 | Tragic $29,031 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $92,239 | Tragic $70,989 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $78,327 | Tragic $59,159 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,884 | Tragic $36,999 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,190 | Tragic $42,098 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,841 | Tragic $33,046 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,041 | Tragic $42,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $85,553 | Tragic $66,529 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,909 | Tragic $69,759 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,722 | Tragic $47,722 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.8% | Exceptional 22.4% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Navajo Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 108.4%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 94.9%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 94.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 31.5%), single female poverty (22.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 37.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 46.8%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Navajo |
Poverty | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Families | Tragic 10.2% | Tragic 18.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 22.3% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Tragic 23.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.6% | Tragic 30.3% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.2% | Tragic 23.3% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Tragic 31.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 30.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.7% | Tragic 30.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 30.5% |
Single Males | Fair 13.0% | Tragic 25.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 31.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 29.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.6% | Tragic 40.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Tragic 19.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 21.1% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Navajo Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 96.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 93.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 84.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Navajo |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Tragic 8.4% |
Males | Poor 5.4% | Tragic 9.8% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 7.3% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.1% | Tragic 29.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 10.6% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Tragic 6.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.9% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Tragic 8.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Navajo Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 19.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Navajo |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 56.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 69.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.6% | Tragic 32.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Tragic 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 73.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 72.8% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Navajo Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 51.4%), currently married (45.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.65, a difference of 9.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Navajo |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 66.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Tragic 26.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 45.1% | Tragic 40.1% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.65 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 8.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Tragic 39.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.0% | Tragic 51.5% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 15.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.38%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Navajo |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.8% | Exceptional 90.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.2% | Average 55.3% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 22.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Navajo Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 47.8%), bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and associate's degree (40.7% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.40%), 11th grade (90.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and 9th grade (93.2% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.76%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Navajo |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Fair 2.1% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Average 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Average 98.0% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Average 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Average 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Fair 97.4% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Fair 97.2% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.1% | Tragic 95.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Tragic 93.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Tragic 92.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 90.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.9% | Tragic 87.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.6% | Tragic 85.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.7% | Tragic 81.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.3% | Tragic 56.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.7% | Tragic 50.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.7% | Tragic 32.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 23.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 2.9% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Laos vs Navajo Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 45.6%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.1%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Laos | Navajo |
Disability | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 14.3% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Females | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 15.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 33.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.2% | Tragic 58.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.6% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Tragic 18.8% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Tragic 2.9% |