Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Netherlands Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,273,542 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Netherlands within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.512. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Netherlands. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 10.4 Immigrants from Netherlands.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $50,458, a difference of 33.3%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $114,987, a difference of 24.7%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $61,096, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $52,592, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $41,870, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $66,463, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 44.6%), family poverty (10.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.77%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.6%), male unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 37.8%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.5%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 29.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 63.8%, a difference of 2.4%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.14, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.0%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 84.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 80.2%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Netherlands communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 23.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 4.1%), male disability (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability (12.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 6.8%).