Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Indonesia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,243,172 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Indonesia within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.514. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Immigrants from Indonesia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to a decrease of 16.7 Immigrants from Indonesia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $48,195, a difference of 27.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,553 compared to $107,627, a difference of 25.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $113,519, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $55,521, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $66,694, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 40.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 35.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.26%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 33.5%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 34.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.0%), and births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 1.0%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.27, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 72.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 64.9%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 54.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Indonesia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%).