Immigrants from Laos vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,702,269 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 24.5 Yugoslavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,857 compared to $42,792, a difference of 13.0%), wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and median male earnings ($49,190 compared to $53,967, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $51,028, a difference of 2.0%), householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $58,243, a difference of 2.7%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $38,573, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 28.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.8%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.41%), married-couple households (45.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (65.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.80%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 71.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and master's degree (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 13.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.29%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.1%).