Immigrants from Laos vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,400,088 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 39.5 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 29.8%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $55,726, a difference of 11.4%), and median female earnings ($36,841 compared to $40,773, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,239 compared to $92,513, a difference of 0.30%), householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $56,495, a difference of 0.40%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $90,186, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 35.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 48.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 40.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 49.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.9%), family households with children (29.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 41.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.32%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.40, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 261.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 126.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 99.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 30.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 69.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 99.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.3%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 32.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.5%).