Alaska Native vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,885,109 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 8.7 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $47,518, a difference of 13.6%), householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $54,922, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,991 compared to $85,787, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 2.5%), median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $48,202, a difference of 3.1%), and per capita income ($39,558 compared to $38,088, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 19.3%), receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 119.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 51.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.2%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (65.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 69.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.0%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 136.7%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 21.4%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (52.8% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and male disability (13.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 3.5%).