Cuban vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,861,983 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $54,922, a difference of 11.7%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $47,518, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($73,392 compared to $73,747, a difference of 0.48%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,301 compared to $85,787, a difference of 0.60%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,483 compared to $82,152, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 39.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 37.5%), and receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.9%), female poverty (15.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and poverty (13.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.4%), male unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.84%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 7.3%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households (67.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.030%), currently married (44.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.30%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 22.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 45.6%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.46%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 9.0%).