Fijian vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,407,694 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.354. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.3%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $48,202, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $47,518, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($74,205 compared to $73,747, a difference of 0.62%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $85,787, a difference of 0.70%), and median family income ($87,387 compared to $88,556, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 18.1%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.5%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.3%), currently married (46.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.1%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.72%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.1%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.3%).