Immigrants from Canada vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,596,550 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.718. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.167% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 167.4 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,412 compared to $38,088, a difference of 29.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,402 compared to $85,787, a difference of 27.5%), and median family income ($112,374 compared to $88,556, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $47,518, a difference of 12.4%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $35,661, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 41.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 37.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.9%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.82%), family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 43.6%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 34.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.6%).