Bermudan vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 32,788,694 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.246% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 246.0 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,911 compared to $38,088, a difference of 12.7%), median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $35,661, a difference of 10.5%), and median family income ($97,577 compared to $88,556, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,359 compared to $47,518, a difference of 0.34%), householder income over 65 years ($58,171 compared to $54,922, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,231 compared to $82,152, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 22.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 21.4%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.72%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.0%), divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.7%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.4%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 37.6%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.2%).