Immigrants from Caribbean vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,886,688 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Immigrant from Caribbean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Caribbean within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Caribbean corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 22.8%), householder income over 65 years ($48,535 compared to $54,922, a difference of 13.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,757 compared to $47,518, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,119 compared to $41,519, a difference of 0.97%), median female earnings ($36,414 compared to $35,661, a difference of 2.1%), and per capita income ($37,254 compared to $38,088, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (19.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 47.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (18.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 42.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.6%), male poverty (14.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 20.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.1%), married-couple households (40.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and currently married (41.3% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.090%), divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 91.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 53.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 11.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 44.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and college, under 1 year (56.6% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.26%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.30%), and associate's degree (39.7% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Caribbean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.6%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.8%).