Houma vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,248,520 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.095% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 95.1 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 54.4%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $54,922, a difference of 22.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $85,787, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $48,202, a difference of 4.9%), median earnings ($38,949 compared to $41,519, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,044 compared to $82,152, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 46.4%), single father poverty (26.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 44.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 6.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 50.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 37.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 26.8%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 15.3%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.27%), divorced or separated (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 30.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 63.9%), professional degree (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 59.4%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 52.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%), 5th grade (96.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.5%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 6.9%).