Immigrants vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,519,694 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.293. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 1.2 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $85,787, a difference of 16.5%), median household income ($85,818 compared to $73,747, a difference of 16.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,423 compared to $82,152, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 0.35%), householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $54,922, a difference of 8.6%), and median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $35,661, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 26.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 22.2%), and single female poverty (21.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.87%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 18.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.9%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.8% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.7%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.13%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 35.3%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.2%).