Filipino vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,999,171 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.731. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.048% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 48.4 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($134,910 compared to $85,787, a difference of 57.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $82,152, a difference of 56.7%), and median household income ($115,509 compared to $73,747, a difference of 56.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 18.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $47,518, a difference of 21.5%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $35,661, a difference of 38.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 81.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 80.7%), and receiving food stamps (7.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 79.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 59.8%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 49.7%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.21%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.91%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 118.8%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 114.0%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 93.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 83.2%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 68.7%), and ambulatory disability (4.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 54.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 13.6%), disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.1%).