Mongolian vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,493,495 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Mongolian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mongolians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.216% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mongolians corresponds to an increase of 216.0 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,602 compared to $85,787, a difference of 30.1%), median family income ($114,553 compared to $88,556, a difference of 29.4%), and per capita income ($49,173 compared to $38,088, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,540 compared to $47,518, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,326 compared to $54,922, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 31.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.2% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 31.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 31.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.5%), and divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 75.7%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.6%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 60.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mongolian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 45.6%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.9%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 11.6%).