Immigrants from Australia vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 77,831,081 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $38,088, a difference of 52.2%), median family income ($126,620 compared to $88,556, a difference of 43.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $82,152, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 12.7%), householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $47,518, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $54,922, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 45.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.1%), births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 37.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.5%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.0%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 34.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 95.4%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 78.4%), and master's degree (20.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 72.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 52.6%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 45.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.0%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 13.7%).