Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Community Comparison

COMPARE

Carpatho Rusyn
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Comanche
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Carpatho Rusyns

Comanche

Good
Poor
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Comanche Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,866,180 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.478. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.460% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 460.1 Comanche.
Carpatho Rusyn Integration in Comanche Communities

Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $38,088, a difference of 24.0%), median family income ($107,502 compared to $88,556, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $82,152, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $47,518, a difference of 3.4%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $54,922, a difference of 11.2%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Income
Income MetricCarpatho RusynComanche
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,248
Tragic
$38,088
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,502
Tragic
$88,556
Median Household Income
Good
$86,635
Tragic
$73,747
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,617
Tragic
$41,519
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,572
Tragic
$48,202
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,825
Tragic
$35,661
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,113
Tragic
$47,518
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,449
Tragic
$82,152
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,777
Tragic
$85,787
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$61,093
Tragic
$54,922
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
25.0%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 51.8%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.5%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.1%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Poverty
Poverty MetricCarpatho RusynComanche
Poverty
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
15.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
11.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
16.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
23.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.5%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
20.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
20.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
16.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
33.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.3%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 44.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.1%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCarpatho RusynComanche
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Tragic
20.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.2%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCarpatho RusynComanche
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.0%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Tragic
77.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
37.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
87.0%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.2%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
79.2%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 2.7%), family households (61.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.6%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCarpatho RusynComanche
Family Households
Tragic
61.1%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Good
27.6%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Tragic
44.5%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
36.7%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.1%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCarpatho RusynComanche
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.7%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Fair
89.5%
Good
89.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.4%
Excellent
56.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
6.8%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.1%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.2%), and master's degree (17.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.69%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Education Level
Education Level MetricCarpatho RusynComanche
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.0%
7th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
95.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Poor
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
91.7%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
89.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Tragic
83.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.9%
Tragic
61.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.2%
Tragic
54.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
39.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.1%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.1%).
Carpatho Rusyn vs Comanche Disability
Disability MetricCarpatho RusynComanche
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.1%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.1%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Average
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Tragic
14.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.6%
Tragic
28.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
51.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%