Arab vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,173,301 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to an increase of 11.3 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,566 compared to $85,787, a difference of 21.9%), median family income ($106,952 compared to $88,556, a difference of 20.8%), and per capita income ($45,662 compared to $38,088, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,219 compared to $47,518, a difference of 7.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $54,922, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.3%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 25.8%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.64%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.32%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 42.8%), master's degree (16.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 38.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 35.1%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.8%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 9.8%).