Slavic vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,946,256 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Slavic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slavs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slavs corresponds to a decrease of 25.0 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slavic and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,629 compared to $85,787, a difference of 19.6%), median family income ($105,144 compared to $88,556, a difference of 18.7%), and per capita income ($45,049 compared to $38,088, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,563 compared to $47,518, a difference of 6.4%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and median female earnings ($39,613 compared to $35,661, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slavic and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 36.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 34.5%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slavic and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slavic and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slavic and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.8%), births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 16.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.81%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slavic and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 28.7%), master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.1%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slavic and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 8.7%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 12.1%).