Israeli vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,108,615 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Israeli communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Israelis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Israelis corresponds to an increase of 18.2 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Israeli and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,596 compared to $38,088, a difference of 38.1%), median family income ($118,577 compared to $88,556, a difference of 33.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,186 compared to $85,787, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,335 compared to $47,518, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,636 compared to $54,922, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Israeli and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 29.3%), single female poverty (19.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 28.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and single father poverty (16.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Israeli and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.92%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Israeli and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 16.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Israeli and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.5%), births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.51%), family households (63.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 25.1%), and no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and no vehicles in household (12.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Israeli and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 96.2%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 73.3%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Israeli and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 51.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 43.4%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 11.4%).