Lumbee vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,581,521 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $47,518, a difference of 37.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $82,152, a difference of 36.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $54,922, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $35,661, a difference of 9.7%), median earnings ($36,876 compared to $41,519, a difference of 12.6%), and median male earnings ($41,715 compared to $48,202, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 72.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (26.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 59.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 27.5%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 101.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 71.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 21.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 31.3%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and currently married (39.8% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 10.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.17%), no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.1%), professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 43.5%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.3%).