Ottawa vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,620,875 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Ottawa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ottawa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.522% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ottawa corresponds to an increase of 522.1 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($33,378 compared to $35,661, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($39,721 compared to $41,519, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,366 compared to $47,518, a difference of 0.32%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,953 compared to $85,787, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($86,380 compared to $88,556, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.6%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.51%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (26.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 14.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 45-54 (79.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.0%), family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.69%), family households (63.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.72%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 38.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.8%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and ged/equivalency (85.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ottawa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.7%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (14.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), disability (14.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and female disability (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.44%).