Hungarian vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,958,100 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Hungarian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hungarians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hungarians corresponds to an increase of 11.1 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,913 compared to $85,787, a difference of 21.1%), per capita income ($45,426 compared to $38,088, a difference of 19.3%), and median family income ($105,609 compared to $88,556, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,247 compared to $47,518, a difference of 5.7%), median female earnings ($39,510 compared to $35,661, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,673 compared to $54,922, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 24.4%), and male poverty (11.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.11%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 51.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.51%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.9%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.070%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.2%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.4%), and master's degree (15.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hungarian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.2%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 13.0%).