Icelander vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,739,082 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.733. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.274% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 273.6 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $85,787, a difference of 19.2%), per capita income ($44,987 compared to $38,088, a difference of 18.1%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $88,556, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $47,518, a difference of 7.9%), median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $35,661, a difference of 9.7%), and wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 32.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 24.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.1%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), family households (63.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.7%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.74%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 35.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 30.7%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 10.6%).