Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,762,167 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.659. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 8.1 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($102,451 compared to $88,556, a difference of 15.7%), per capita income ($43,838 compared to $38,088, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,467 compared to $85,787, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $47,518, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,458 compared to $82,152, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 30.2%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 29.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 18.6%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 10.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.17%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.28%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 36.1%), master's degree (16.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 35.1%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.12%), 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 42.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 38.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 9.6%).