Blackfeet vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,630,925 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.295% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to an increase of 295.2 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $47,518, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,029 compared to $54,922, a difference of 1.7%), and per capita income ($37,695 compared to $38,088, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($88,717 compared to $88,556, a difference of 0.18%), median household income ($73,509 compared to $73,747, a difference of 0.32%), and median male earnings ($48,402 compared to $48,202, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 7.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (23.6% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and female poverty (16.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.89%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.6%), single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.21%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.16%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 4.4%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.090%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.3%).