African vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,203,061 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.843. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 20.8 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $82,152, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $35,661, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($47,994 compared to $48,202, a difference of 0.43%), per capita income ($37,785 compared to $38,088, a difference of 0.80%), and median family income ($87,820 compared to $88,556, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 14.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.7% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 9.0%), and single male poverty (14.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), single father poverty (18.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and single mother poverty (33.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 36.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.3%), married-couple households (40.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.070%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (62.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.5%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 7th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.74%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.3%).