Ugandan vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,051,420 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.088. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to a decrease of 5.3 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $85,787, a difference of 20.6%), median family income ($106,541 compared to $88,556, a difference of 20.3%), and median household income ($87,557 compared to $73,747, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,923 compared to $47,518, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $54,922, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 30.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 22.0%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.56%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and married-couple households (43.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 44.8%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 41.8%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.0%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.3%).