Argentinean vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 84,992,736 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.078% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 77.7 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $38,088, a difference of 30.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $85,787, a difference of 28.3%), and median household income ($93,960 compared to $73,747, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $47,518, a difference of 14.0%), and median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $35,661, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 37.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 37.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.39%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 13.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 22.5%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.76%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 10.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 67.7%), master's degree (18.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 50.3%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 4th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 57.2%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 44.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 11.9%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 12.2%).