Salvadoran vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,057,460 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Salvadoran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Salvadorans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Salvadorans corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,412 compared to $47,518, a difference of 16.6%), median household income ($82,449 compared to $73,747, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,842 compared to $85,787, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($48,646 compared to $48,202, a difference of 0.92%), per capita income ($38,858 compared to $38,088, a difference of 2.0%), and median earnings ($42,912 compared to $41,519, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 27.9%), single father poverty (14.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 24.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.38%), family poverty (10.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.2%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.8%), and family households with children (29.9% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.50%), births to unmarried women (36.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (43.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.090%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 81.7%), high school diploma (81.7% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and college, under 1 year (57.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.10%), bachelor's degree (31.8% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and master's degree (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Salvadoran and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 51.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 39.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 5.7%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 13.5%).