Burmese vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,334,074 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $85,787, a difference of 41.6%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $73,747, a difference of 39.9%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $88,556, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.9%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $47,518, a difference of 15.3%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $35,661, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 59.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 55.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.8%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 24.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 39.3%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.0%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and family households (65.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.47%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.60%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 67.8%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 62.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 60.1%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.7%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 12.6%).