Costa Rican vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,210,966 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.430% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 429.7 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,779 compared to $85,787, a difference of 19.8%), median household income ($87,262 compared to $73,747, a difference of 18.3%), and median family income ($103,989 compared to $88,556, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $35,661, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $47,518, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 25.7%), single male poverty (12.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 25.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.46%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.44%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.3%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.84%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.5%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 23.7%), and bachelor's degree (37.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.1% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.040%), 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 37.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 35.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.3%), disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.9%).