Immigrants from Grenada vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,533,610 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,123 compared to $29,031, a difference of 41.6%), wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 38.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($88,311 compared to $66,529, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $47,722, a difference of 6.3%), median male earnings ($50,279 compared to $42,098, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $69,759, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 94.9%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 73.1%), and married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 18.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 77.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 63.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and female unemployment (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 59.2%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 41.8%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.65, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (39.1% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 0.35%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and family households (62.6% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 297.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 200.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 145.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 44.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 93.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 145.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (35.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 48.1%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 48.0%), and associate's degree (42.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (90.1% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.16%), ged/equivalency (81.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and high school diploma (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 111.4%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 74.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 4.8%).